✶ñwe pron. “1 pl. inclusive base”

✶ñwe pron. “1 pl. inclusive base”

References ✧ VT48/10

Glosses

• “1 pl. inclusive” ✧ VT48/10

Related

• we “dual” is only otherwise used as dual in ñwe ✧ VT48/10

Derivations

• < ✶me “1st-pl-exclusive pronoun” ✧ VT48/10

Derivatives

• > ✶we “we, us (inclusive)” ✧ VT48/10; VT48/10
  • > ᴺS. !gwe “we (inclusive)”
    • ⇒ ᴺS. !gwen “us (inclusive)”
    • ⇒ ᴺS. !gwîn “our (inclusive)”
  • ⇒ ᴺS. !pe “we (inclusive)”
    • ⇒ ᴺS. !pen “us (inclusive)”
    • ⇒ ᴺS. !pîn “our (inclusive)”
  • > ✶wwe ✧ VT49/51
  • > Q. -lvë “we (inclusive)” ✧ VT49/51
  • > Q. ve² “us (inclusive)” ✧ PE17/130; PE17/130; VT49/51
    • ⇒ ᴺQ. !venya “ours (inclusive)”
    • ⇒ Q. inwë “ourselves (inclusive)”

✶-sñe suf. “dual 1st person b (exclusive)”

Reference ✧ PE19/69 ✧ sñe “dual 1st person b (exclusive)”

Derivatives

• > Q. -ngwë “we (inclusive dual)” ✧ PE19/69

✶wwe pron.

Reference ✧ VT49/51

Related

• wwe did not yield a satisfactory form [and] was replaced by nki “1a + 2a” ✧ VT49/51

Derivations

• < ✶we “we, us (inclusive)” ✧ VT49/50
  • < ✶ñwe “1 pl. inclusive base” ✧ VT48/10; VT48/10
    • < ✶me “1st-pl-exclusive pronoun” ✧ VT48/10