Ilk. [z] became [i] before voiced stops; [Vz{bdg}] > [Vi{bdg}]
In Ilkorin, it seems that [z] vocalized into [i] before voiced stops, similar to developments in Old Noldorin. The clearest examples are ᴹ✶mazgē > Ilk. maig¹ (Ety/MASAG) and ᴹ✶mizdē > [miid(e) >] Dor. mîd (Ety/MIZD).
The vocalization after [e] are less clear. There are two examples: ᴹ✶ezdē > Ilk. Êd (EtyAC/EZDĒ) and ᴹ✶mizdā > [mezda >] Dor. mêd, where the second example would have developed a medial [-e-] due to Ilkorin a-affection. In these examples, it is possible that the [z] became [e] or simply lengthened the preceding vowel, so that the development was [-ezd-] > [-ēd-]. However, the [z] could also have vocalized into [i] as it did after [a] and [i] if the resulting diphthong [ei] became [ē] afterwards: [-ezd-] > [-eid-] > [-ēd-]. This second development is the theory used here.
There are no attested examples of the vocalization of [z] after [o] and [u] or before [b], but presumably the developments would have been similar, probably resulting in [oi] > [ui] and [ui], respectively.
Order (04500)
After | 04300 | voiced stops spirantalized after vowels | ᴹ✶mizdē
>
Dor. mīd ᴹ✶mazgē > Ilk. maig |
Ety/MIZD Ety/MASAG |
Before | 05200 | later [ei], [ou] became [ē], [au] | ᴹ✶mizdā > Dor. mēd | Ety/MIZD |
Phonetic Rule Elements
|
> |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
> |
|
Phonetic Rule Examples
ezde > eide | Vzd > Vid | ᴹ✶EZDĒ > Ilk. Ēd | ✧ EtyAC/EZDĒ |
mezda > meida | Vzd > Vid | ᴹ✶mizdā > Dor. mēd | ✧ Ety/MIZD |
mazga > maiga | Vzg > Vig | ᴹ✶mazgā > Ilk. maig | ✧ EtyAC/MASAG |
mazge > maige | Vzg > Vig | ᴹ✶mazgē > Ilk. maig | ✧ Ety/MASAG |
mizde > mīde | Vzg > Vig | ᴹ✶mizdē > Dor. mīd | ✧ Ety/MIZD |